-
Legal Robe
IN RE : ABDUL KALAM AMMANGOD KUNHAMU – Customs
F. No. 375/06/B/2017-R.A. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT…
-
Legal Robe
Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962
114AA. Penalty for use of false and incorrect material. —If…
-
Legal Robe
Gujarat Borosil Limited VERSUS C.C.E. & S.T.- Surat-ii – Excise
Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal West Zonal Bench At Ahmedabad REGIONAL BENCH-COURT NO. 3 Excise Tax Appeal No. 14081 of 2013- DB…
-
Legal Robe
Social Media Vs Trademark Infringement
BLOG POST Author: Ahona Bhattacharya Final Year LLB Student…
Latest Posts
- Arrest under Customs and GST Acts – Radhika Agarwal Versus Union of India and Others
- M/s. SHV LPG India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise
- You can Redeem only if you agree to re-export; Adjudicating Authority do not have such power for conditional redemption – Kamalakanth Dhandayuthapani Versus Commissioner of Customs (Port-Import)
- M/s. Cognizant Technology Solutions India Private Limited Versus Commissioner of GST and Central Excise
- Conclusions Beyond the Scope of the Show Cause Notice (SCN) – M/s. Sree Saradhambal Automobiles (P) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST and Central Excise
Categories
Tags
advocate budget caselaw cases cestat CHA circular customs customsact delhihighcourt delhi high court dgft direct tax excise Favorite personal finances finance foreign trade policy gst highcourt income tax incometax indirecttax iphone judge judgment law law judgment lawstudent lawyer legalnews legalrobe legal robe news notification order service servicetax service tax service tax tribunal supremecourt tax trademark law trending trending case tribunal