-
Legal Robe
RIDAVA PETROCHEMICALS PVT LTD VERSUS C.C.-KANDLA
Customs Appeal No.10165 of 2022 (Arising out of OIA-KDL-CUSTM-000-APP-40-21-22 dated 30/11/2021 passed by Commissioner…
-
Legal Robe
NAYARA ENERGY LTD VERSUS C.C.E. & S.T.-RAJKOT
Excise Appeal No.10292 of 2020 (Arising out of OIA-RAJ-EXCUS-000-APP-192-2019 dated 11/12/2019 passed by Commissioner…
-
Legal Robe
Idmc Limited VERSUS C.C.E. & C.-Anand
EXCISE Appeal No. 10016 of 2018-DB [Arising out of Order-in-Original/Appeal No VAD-EXCUS-003-APP-223-2017-18 dated 24.07.2017…
-
Legal Robe
Commissioner of Central Excise & ST, Daman VERSUS Garg Industries Pvt Limited
EXCISE Appeal No. 10151 of 2020-DB [Arising out of Order-in-Original/Appeal…
Latest Posts
- Arrest under Customs and GST Acts – Radhika Agarwal Versus Union of India and Others
- M/s. SHV LPG India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise
- You can Redeem only if you agree to re-export; Adjudicating Authority do not have such power for conditional redemption – Kamalakanth Dhandayuthapani Versus Commissioner of Customs (Port-Import)
- M/s. Cognizant Technology Solutions India Private Limited Versus Commissioner of GST and Central Excise
- Conclusions Beyond the Scope of the Show Cause Notice (SCN) – M/s. Sree Saradhambal Automobiles (P) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST and Central Excise
Categories
Tags
advocate budget caselaw cases cestat CHA circular customs customsact delhihighcourt delhi high court dgft direct tax excise Favorite personal finances finance foreign trade policy gst highcourt income tax incometax indirecttax iphone judge judgment law law judgment lawstudent lawyer legalnews legalrobe legal robe news notification order service servicetax service tax service tax tribunal supremecourt tax trademark law trending trending case tribunal